Translate to multiple languages

Subscribe to my Email updates

https://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify?uri=helgeScherlundelearning
Enjoy what you've read, make sure you subscribe to my Email Updates

Wednesday, December 03, 2014

Local students to participate in international Hour of Code online learning event

Photo:
Macomb County elementary school students will join 100 million or so of their closest friends next week when they participate in a worldwide event designed to pique their interest in computer science."

The Hour of Code is a one-hour introduction to computer science designed to “de mystify” code and demonstrate that anybody can learn the basics. The event will be held Dec. 8-14 in conjunction with Computer Science Education Week.

Photo: Hour of Code

Organized by Code.org., a non-profit organization dedicated to making computer science more available in schools, the program affords opportunities for students to get involved simply by logging on to a website, accessing tutorials and setting up an Hour of Code event.

Several schools in the Utica and Romeo school districts informed The Macomb Daily they would participate in the event.

“It’s trying to get students interested in computer programming,” said Jackie Zawierucha, media center teacher at Beacon Tree Elementary School in Shelby Township. “There is such a lack of people who are computer programmers.

“We did it last year, and the kids absolutely love it.”

While students are exposed to computers practically from the first day they enter kindergarten, the need for them to learn and be comfortable with computer science is increasing, said Eric Whitney, an assistant superintendent with Romeo Community Schools. Whitney said all 2,500 elementary students in his district will participate in Hour of Code.
Read more...

Additional resources 
Hour of Code 
The Hour of Code - WORLDWIDE  
 

Source: The Macomb Daily and Code.org Channel (YouTube)

Local students to participate in international Hour of Code online learning event

Photo:
Macomb County elementary school students will join 100 million or so of their closest friends next week when they participate in a worldwide event designed to pique their interest in computer science."

The Hour of Code is a one-hour introduction to computer science designed to “de mystify” code and demonstrate that anybody can learn the basics. The event will be held Dec. 8-14 in conjunction with Computer Science Education Week.

Photo: Hour of Code

Organized by Code.org., a non-profit organization dedicated to making computer science more available in schools, the program affords opportunities for students to get involved simply by logging on to a website, accessing tutorials and setting up an Hour of Code event.

Several schools in the Utica and Romeo school districts informed The Macomb Daily they would participate in the event.

“It’s trying to get students interested in computer programming,” said Jackie Zawierucha, media center teacher at Beacon Tree Elementary School in Shelby Township. “There is such a lack of people who are computer programmers.

“We did it last year, and the kids absolutely love it.”

While students are exposed to computers practically from the first day they enter kindergarten, the need for them to learn and be comfortable with computer science is increasing, said Eric Whitney, an assistant superintendent with Romeo Community Schools. Whitney said all 2,500 elementary students in his district will participate in Hour of Code.
Read more...

Additional resources 
Hour of Code 
The Hour of Code - WORLDWIDE  
 

Source: The Macomb Daily and Code.org Channel (YouTube)

North Greenville University recognized for online learning

The Affordable Colleges Foundation, a resource for online learning and college affordability information, ranked North Greenville University seventeenth out of 50 in their recently-released, national list of the Best Online Christian Colleges (2014-2015) according to Travelers Rest Tribune.
 
Photo: Travelers Rest Tribune

According to ACF, schools included in the rankings not only have clear and active Christian affiliations, but they've proven their excellence in online education.

"The faith-based colleges on our list are making online learning a clear priority," said Dan Schuessler, founder and CEO of Affordable Colleges Foundation. "Each of these Christian colleges incorporates innovative technologies to help students pursue their higher education, while providing a strong connection to spirituality."

According to the Department of Education, more than 900 faith-based institutions have received regional or national accreditation, meaning Christ-centered students have an abundance of high-quality choices when it comes to pursuing their higher education.
 
"Hundreds of Christian institutions can be found throughout the United States. There's definitely history there," said Schuessler. "We're excited to highlight the ones expanding their programs to include hybrid or fully-online options."
Read more... 

Related link
NGUs online program

Source: Travelers Rest Tribune

North Greenville University recognized for online learning

The Affordable Colleges Foundation, a resource for online learning and college affordability information, ranked North Greenville University seventeenth out of 50 in their recently-released, national list of the Best Online Christian Colleges (2014-2015) according to Travelers Rest Tribune.
 
Photo: Travelers Rest Tribune

According to ACF, schools included in the rankings not only have clear and active Christian affiliations, but they've proven their excellence in online education.

"The faith-based colleges on our list are making online learning a clear priority," said Dan Schuessler, founder and CEO of Affordable Colleges Foundation. "Each of these Christian colleges incorporates innovative technologies to help students pursue their higher education, while providing a strong connection to spirituality."

According to the Department of Education, more than 900 faith-based institutions have received regional or national accreditation, meaning Christ-centered students have an abundance of high-quality choices when it comes to pursuing their higher education.
 
"Hundreds of Christian institutions can be found throughout the United States. There's definitely history there," said Schuessler. "We're excited to highlight the ones expanding their programs to include hybrid or fully-online options."
Read more... 

Related link
NGUs online program

Source: Travelers Rest Tribune

Tuesday, December 02, 2014

Study Finds Full-Time Preschool Better Prepares Kids for Kindergarten

"Full-time preschool is better than part-time when it comes to preparing children for kindergarten, according to a study by the University of Minnesota." continues KTIC. 

Photo: KTIC

Researchers at the university’s Humphrey School of Public Affairs tested one thousand 3- and 4-year-olds enrolled in preschool programs affiliated with 11 Chicago schools to compare students who attended preschool seven hours a day to those who attended three-hour programs.

They found 81 percent of the all-day preschoolers were ready socially and academically to enter kindergarten, compared to 59 percent of students enrolled in the half-day program.
The study also found that daily attendance rates for all-day preschool kids were better than those in part-time programs.
Read more... 

Additional resources 


New report below published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Association of a Full-Day vs Part-Day Preschool Intervention With School Readiness, Attendance, and Parent Involvement
 
Source: KTIC

Study Finds Full-Time Preschool Better Prepares Kids for Kindergarten

"Full-time preschool is better than part-time when it comes to preparing children for kindergarten, according to a study by the University of Minnesota." continues KTIC. 

Photo: KTIC

Researchers at the university’s Humphrey School of Public Affairs tested one thousand 3- and 4-year-olds enrolled in preschool programs affiliated with 11 Chicago schools to compare students who attended preschool seven hours a day to those who attended three-hour programs.

They found 81 percent of the all-day preschoolers were ready socially and academically to enter kindergarten, compared to 59 percent of students enrolled in the half-day program.
The study also found that daily attendance rates for all-day preschool kids were better than those in part-time programs.
Read more... 

Additional resources 


New report below published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Association of a Full-Day vs Part-Day Preschool Intervention With School Readiness, Attendance, and Parent Involvement
 
Source: KTIC

Monday, December 01, 2014

Math That Pursues, Spins and Swarms

Follow on Twitter as
@HeleneStapinski
"A Robot Exhibit at MoMath Aims to Bring Math to Life" according to New York Times.

Behind a black curtain in a downstairs corner of the National Museum of Mathematics in Manhattan (known as MoMath), a small group of mathematicians, designers and engineers was hard at work — laughing, shouting, clapping and having a blast, while being chased by robots.

They were doing final testing on an exhibit called Robot Swarm, opening Dec. 14 and featuring dozens of glowing, motorized, interactive robots that resemble horseshoe crabs.
 
Hannah Lawrence, left, and Rachel Lawrence playing Robot Swarm, an exhibit in which one can control the movement of differently colored robots.
Photo: New York Times

The museum says it is the nation’s most technologically ambitious robotics exhibit. But the assembled experts, standing in stocking feet, were as excited as a gaggle of 6-year-olds.

Sealed under an 11-by-12-foot glass floor, the small, colored robots swarm, skitter and react to whoever is standing on top of the glass. It is a strangely exhilarating sensation to be shoeless and have creatures — albeit human-made, computer-controlled creatures — react to your every step.

“It’s cool, right?” asked a creator of the exhibit, Glen Whitney, who is also a co-founder of the museum. “It’s a feeling of power.”

Four visitors at a time will don harnesses with a small “reflector pod” on the right shoulder. That sends a location signal to overhead cameras, which transmit the information to the robots — which, in turn, move in accord with a variety of programmed settings determined by visitors working a control panel.

Set the robots to “Run Away” mode, for example, and you can’t help feeling like Godzilla, stomping around the glass floor and scattering the frightened robots to the far corners of the grid. “Pursue” mode can be downright creepy, with the robots — like giant glowing cockroaches or trilobites — following you everywhere, trying to get as close to you as possible, surrounding you and then refusing to go away — until the algorithm is changed. In the more amusing “Spin” mode, the robots play a game of Simon Says, turning in whatever direction you turn, spinning when you spin.

In “Swarm” mode, the robots instead follow one another, like children chasing a soccer ball. In “Robophobia,” they try to get as far away from one another as they can, eventually settling on a static arrangement that maximizes the distance between each one; that usually results in a pattern, much like the particles in a crystal.

And in “On Your Marks,” they organize themselves by color, making their way around the play area like tiny bumper cars until they locate the others in their group and line up accordingly.

When the robots run low on power, they leave the play area and go to the nearby docking zone to recharge. They are immediately replaced by another robot, as if part of an artificially intelligent hockey team.

Beyond the fun factor, the robots demonstrate a hot topic of research these days: the mathematics of emergent behavior.
Read more... 

Additional resources 
Robot Swarm opens Dec. 14 at the National Museum of Mathematics, 11 East 26th Street, Manhattan. The museum is open daily from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Information: momath.org.   

Source: New York Times

Math That Pursues, Spins and Swarms

Follow on Twitter as
@HeleneStapinski
"A Robot Exhibit at MoMath Aims to Bring Math to Life" according to New York Times.

Behind a black curtain in a downstairs corner of the National Museum of Mathematics in Manhattan (known as MoMath), a small group of mathematicians, designers and engineers was hard at work — laughing, shouting, clapping and having a blast, while being chased by robots.

They were doing final testing on an exhibit called Robot Swarm, opening Dec. 14 and featuring dozens of glowing, motorized, interactive robots that resemble horseshoe crabs.
 
Hannah Lawrence, left, and Rachel Lawrence playing Robot Swarm, an exhibit in which one can control the movement of differently colored robots.
Photo: New York Times

The museum says it is the nation’s most technologically ambitious robotics exhibit. But the assembled experts, standing in stocking feet, were as excited as a gaggle of 6-year-olds.

Sealed under an 11-by-12-foot glass floor, the small, colored robots swarm, skitter and react to whoever is standing on top of the glass. It is a strangely exhilarating sensation to be shoeless and have creatures — albeit human-made, computer-controlled creatures — react to your every step.

“It’s cool, right?” asked a creator of the exhibit, Glen Whitney, who is also a co-founder of the museum. “It’s a feeling of power.”

Four visitors at a time will don harnesses with a small “reflector pod” on the right shoulder. That sends a location signal to overhead cameras, which transmit the information to the robots — which, in turn, move in accord with a variety of programmed settings determined by visitors working a control panel.

Set the robots to “Run Away” mode, for example, and you can’t help feeling like Godzilla, stomping around the glass floor and scattering the frightened robots to the far corners of the grid. “Pursue” mode can be downright creepy, with the robots — like giant glowing cockroaches or trilobites — following you everywhere, trying to get as close to you as possible, surrounding you and then refusing to go away — until the algorithm is changed. In the more amusing “Spin” mode, the robots play a game of Simon Says, turning in whatever direction you turn, spinning when you spin.

In “Swarm” mode, the robots instead follow one another, like children chasing a soccer ball. In “Robophobia,” they try to get as far away from one another as they can, eventually settling on a static arrangement that maximizes the distance between each one; that usually results in a pattern, much like the particles in a crystal.

And in “On Your Marks,” they organize themselves by color, making their way around the play area like tiny bumper cars until they locate the others in their group and line up accordingly.

When the robots run low on power, they leave the play area and go to the nearby docking zone to recharge. They are immediately replaced by another robot, as if part of an artificially intelligent hockey team.

Beyond the fun factor, the robots demonstrate a hot topic of research these days: the mathematics of emergent behavior.
Read more... 

Additional resources 
Robot Swarm opens Dec. 14 at the National Museum of Mathematics, 11 East 26th Street, Manhattan. The museum is open daily from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Information: momath.org.   

Source: New York Times

Is AI a Myth?

Follow on Twitter as @RickSearle1
Rick Searle, writer and educator writes, "A few weeks back the technologist Jaron Lanier gave a provocative talk over at The Edge in which he declared ideas swirling around the current manifestation AI to be a “myth”, and a dangerous myth at that."
  
Yet Lanier was only one of a set of prominent thinkers and technologists who have appeared over the last few months to challenge want they saw as a flawed narrative surrounding recent advances in artificial intelligence.

Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies
by Nick Bostrom

There was a piece in The New York Review of Books back in October by the most famous skeptic from the last peak in AI – back in the early 1980’s, John Searle. (Relation to the author lost in the mists of time) It was Searle who invented the well-know thought experiment of the “Chinese Room”, which purports to show that a computer can be very clever without actually knowing anything at all. 
Searle was no less critical of the recent incarnation of AI, and questioned the assumptions behind both Luciano Floridi’s Fourth Revolution and Nick Bostrom’s Super-Intelligence.
Also in October, Michael Jordan, the guy who brought us neural and Bayesian networks (not the gentleman who gave us mind-bending slam dunks) sought to puncture what he sees as hype surrounding both AI and Big Data. And just the day before this Thanksgiving, Kurt Anderson gave us a very long piece in Vanity Fair in which he wondered which side of this now enjoined battle between AI believers and skeptics would ultimately be proven correct.

I think seeing clearly what this debate is and isn’t about might give us a better handle on what is actually going on in AI, right now, in the next few decades, and in reference to a farther off future we have to start at least thinking about it- even if there’s no much to actually do regarding the latter question for a few decades at the least.

The first thing I think one needs to grasp is that none of the AI skeptics are making non-materialistic claims, or claims that human level intelligence in machines is theoretically impossible. These aren’t people arguing that there’s some spiritual something that humans possess that we’ll be unable to replicate in machines. What they are arguing against is what they see as a misinterpretation of what is happening in AI right now, what we are experiencing with our Siri(s) and self-driving cars and Watsons. This question of timing is important far beyond a singularitarian’s fear that he won’t be alive long enough for his upload, rather, it touches on questions of research sustainability, economic equality, and political power.

Just to get the time horizon straight, Nick Bostrom has stated that top AI researchers give us a 90% probability of having human level machine intelligence between 2075 and 2090. If we just average those we’re out to 2083 by the time human equivalent AI emerges. In the Kurt Andersen piece, even the AI skeptic Lanier thinks humanesque machines are likely by around 2100.
Read more... 

Related link
Utopia or Dystopiawhere past meets future.   

Source: Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

Is AI a Myth?

Follow on Twitter as @RickSearle1
Rick Searle, writer and educator writes, "A few weeks back the technologist Jaron Lanier gave a provocative talk over at The Edge in which he declared ideas swirling around the current manifestation AI to be a “myth”, and a dangerous myth at that."
  
Yet Lanier was only one of a set of prominent thinkers and technologists who have appeared over the last few months to challenge want they saw as a flawed narrative surrounding recent advances in artificial intelligence.

Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies
by Nick Bostrom

There was a piece in The New York Review of Books back in October by the most famous skeptic from the last peak in AI – back in the early 1980’s, John Searle. (Relation to the author lost in the mists of time) It was Searle who invented the well-know thought experiment of the “Chinese Room”, which purports to show that a computer can be very clever without actually knowing anything at all. 
Searle was no less critical of the recent incarnation of AI, and questioned the assumptions behind both Luciano Floridi’s Fourth Revolution and Nick Bostrom’s Super-Intelligence.
Also in October, Michael Jordan, the guy who brought us neural and Bayesian networks (not the gentleman who gave us mind-bending slam dunks) sought to puncture what he sees as hype surrounding both AI and Big Data. And just the day before this Thanksgiving, Kurt Anderson gave us a very long piece in Vanity Fair in which he wondered which side of this now enjoined battle between AI believers and skeptics would ultimately be proven correct.

I think seeing clearly what this debate is and isn’t about might give us a better handle on what is actually going on in AI, right now, in the next few decades, and in reference to a farther off future we have to start at least thinking about it- even if there’s no much to actually do regarding the latter question for a few decades at the least.

The first thing I think one needs to grasp is that none of the AI skeptics are making non-materialistic claims, or claims that human level intelligence in machines is theoretically impossible. These aren’t people arguing that there’s some spiritual something that humans possess that we’ll be unable to replicate in machines. What they are arguing against is what they see as a misinterpretation of what is happening in AI right now, what we are experiencing with our Siri(s) and self-driving cars and Watsons. This question of timing is important far beyond a singularitarian’s fear that he won’t be alive long enough for his upload, rather, it touches on questions of research sustainability, economic equality, and political power.

Just to get the time horizon straight, Nick Bostrom has stated that top AI researchers give us a 90% probability of having human level machine intelligence between 2075 and 2090. If we just average those we’re out to 2083 by the time human equivalent AI emerges. In the Kurt Andersen piece, even the AI skeptic Lanier thinks humanesque machines are likely by around 2100.
Read more... 

Related link
Utopia or Dystopia where past meets future.   

Source: Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies