Don’t plan for technology; plan for learning by Alan November
"You never know how someone will react when you suggest that they junk
their title and replace it with a new one that leads to a different
focus of work—not to mention the confusion this could cause across the
faculty, or the possible political tension it might generate".
If all teachers learned how to use all of the available tools—a
nearly impossible and hugely time-consuming task—this might not lead to
improved learning. I have watched students in laptop schools sitting in
rows, taking notes on their machines from a teacher who is giving a
decade-old lecture on an interactive whiteboard. While this kind of
implementation might be deemed a success in terms of the technical
adoption, it’s nothing more than the same script with new tools—and we
shouldn’t expect any different results. There has to be more to this massive investment than introducing new tools, only to end up with same work.
One of the most important learning design questions is, “What do
teachers need to unlearn in order to shift ownership of the learning
process to their students?” For example, I believe that in many cases,
we should teach students to research their own answers to problems,
rather than depend on a teacher to answer the question for them. I
also believe we can empower students to co-create assessments. Whoever
“owns” the learning will take more responsibility for its quality.
Read more...
About the Author
Alan November is the founder of ed-tech consulting firm November
Learning. Join Alan in Boston for the 2013 Building Learning Communities
Conference, where pre-conference sessions and keynotes with Dr. Yong
Zhao and Dr. David Weinberger will lead into three days containing more
than 100 sessions focusing on Common Core, critical thinking, global
communication, creativity, and other ways to achieve more meaningful
teaching and learning enhanced by technology.
Source: eSchool News
Posts
