Translate to multiple languages

Thursday, October 06, 2016

Death of the university greatly exaggerated, says Michael Crow | Times Higher Education

"At THE World Academic Summit, academics and entrepreneurs debate impact of technology on teaching" reports Chris Havergal, reporter whose brief includes Scotland, Wales and devolved government, the internationalisation of higher education, university administration and business schools.

Pre-register for the THE World Academic Summit 2017 at King's College London.

Entrepreneurs who predict the death of the university have “no idea what they are talking about”, Times Higher Education's World Academic Summit has been told. 

Beating heart of education: leading universities’ traditional degrees are predicted to remain popular for the foreseeable future.
Photo: Peter Marcus

Michael Crow, the president of Arizona State University, told the event that such prophets of doom were largely seeking “personal return” from investments that they made in technology. 

“Some people in the private sector have argued that college will go away; those people have no idea what they are talking about,” Professor Crow told the audience at the University of California, Berkeley. “[Some people think] that somehow technologies will be put in and take over what colleges will do; those people have no idea what they are talking about either.

“They are just largely people seeking some sort of personal return from investments that they might make in technologies.”

While Professor Crow did not specify the technology evangelists he was referring to, a very different vision of the future had been offered in the preceding conference session by Ryan Craig, the author of College Disrupted: The Great Unbundling of Higher Education

Mr Craig, the managing director of investment firm University Ventures, said that higher education institutions were producing students who lacked the skills demanded by employers and that a degree was a “luxury that many cannot afford”.

He argued that improved data about what employers wanted would allow students to identify their skills gaps and the best educational trajectory for themselves in the same way that a GPS satellite navigation device is designed to provide the best route for a journey.

In such a system, it would be better for most students to take shorter courses of 12 to 18 months in universities to develop the core “competencies” needed for their first job, and then return several years later to acquire the skills required for more specialised and managerial roles, Mr Craig said.
Read more... 

Source: Times Higher Education

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my Email Updates!