|  | 
| Carlo Rovelli points out that our entire conception of reality is blurred, necessarily – we can only discern the big events, not the infinitesimally small. Photo: Stefania D’Alessandro/Getty Images | 
We live in the past. When we look 
deep into the night sky the radiance of the stars we see is anything 
from minutes to millions of years old: we are stargazing into the past. 
Even here on earth the “present moment” is an illusion. The light that 
for me is the image of your face takes an interval of time, however 
brief, to reach the retina of my eye, so that for me the you I see is 
you as you were an instant ago. It is a dizzying thought. Carlo Rovelli 
has many such facts and phenomena to confront us with, that require us 
to bethink ourselves. As he remarks, “We know little of the actual 
relation between what we see of the world and the world itself.”
Rovelli is a physicist working in 
the field of quantum gravity – “There is not yet a theory of quantum 
gravity that has been generally accepted by the scientific community, or
 obtained experimental support” – and is based in Marseilles, where he 
directs a research group at the Centre de physique théorique. He is also
 a masterly interpreter to the layman of highly complex and 
counter-intuitive current theories of the actual nature of reality, that
 reality to which most of us outside the laboratory are purblind. As the
 title of Rovelli’s previous book has it, Reality Is Not What It Seems.
 But have no fear: he is a wonderfully humane, gentle and witty guide 
through the theoretical thickets, for he is as much philosopher and poet
 as he is a scientist.
Perhaps the easiest means of 
access to this captivating, fascinating, profoundly beautiful but 
undeniably intricate book is to consider, as Rovelli does in Chapter 4, 
the contrast between Aristotle’s and Isaac Newton’s notions of what time
 is. For Aristotle, philosopher of the actual, time is nothing more or 
less than the measurement of change: “If nothing changes, there is no 
time.” Newton, on the other hand, founded his physics on the premise 
that there is such a thing as absolute time – and absolute space, too, 
but that is another matter – which passes in a seemingly Platonic 
somewhere, “independently of things and of their changes”. 
Another structure
We live in a Newtonian universe, 
as we must. Newton, it might be said, made a home for us, accommodating,
 dependable, built to our scale, and there we reside, and always shall. 
There is, however, not next door but on the very same site as our House 
of the World, another structure, wherein other laws hold sway, and 
another reality is in place. Here the medium in which things exist is 
Einstein’s spacetime. “This is the synthesis that Einstein found between
 Aristotle’s conception of time and Newton’s,” Rovelli tells us. “With a
 tremendous beat of his wing, Einstein understands that Aristotle and 
Newton are both right.” However, Newton is mistaken in holding that time
 is absolute and independent of things, “that it passes regularly, 
imperturbably, separately, from everything else”.
Read more...
Additional resources
Source: Irish Times
Read more...
Additional resources
|  | 
| The Order of Time | 
Source: Irish Times
 

 


 
 Posts
Posts
 
 



 
