Photo: Javier Zarracina/Vox |
The most mind-boggling controversy in the contemporary
philosophy of science is the “doomsday argument,” a claim that a
mathematical formula can predict how long the human race will survive.
It gives us even odds that our species will meet its end within the next
760 years.
The doomsday argument doesn’t tell what’s going to kill us — it just gives the date (very, very approximately).
When I first came across this idea, I thought it was
absurd. A prediction must be founded on data, not math! That is by no
means an uncommon reaction. One critic, physicist Eric J. Lerner,
branded doomsday “pseudo-science, a mere manipulation of numbers.”
Prof. Holger Bech Nielsen Photo: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
Demographers have estimated the total number of people
who ever lived at about 100 billion. That means that about 100 billion
people were born before me. Currently, about 130 million people are born
each year. At that rate, it would take only about 760 years for another
100 billion more people to be born. That’s the basis of the claim that
there’s a 50 percent chance that humans will become extinct within about
760 years. The flip side of the claim is there’s also a 50 percent
chance we’ll survive past 760 years, possibly long past that.
As Holger Bech Nielsen pointed out, the latter part of
this estimation isn’t airtight. A sharp decrease in the birthrate could
postpone doomsday. Yet it’s hard to put an upbeat spin on that. It might
mean a global catastrophe leaving a handful of post-apocalyptic
survivors.
Read more...
The Doomsday Calculation: How an Equation that Predicts the Future Is Transforming Everything We Know About Life and the Universe |
Source: Vox.com