Translate into a different language

Monday, May 09, 2016

'What Philosophy Can Do' | Commonweal

Photo: Gordon Marino
"Gary Gutting's new essay collection covers a wide swath of topics, including God, free will, art, education, consciousness, happiness, and the limits of science." inform Gordon Marino, professor of philosophy at St. Olaf College, director of the college’s Hong Kierkegaard Library, and editor of The Quotable Kierkegaard (Princeton University Press, 2014). 

Photo: Commonweal

Philosophy has some fresh wind in its sails these days. People who have grown numb to religion still retain the feeling that there must be something deeper within themselves and in the hurly-burly of life. And so they turn to the new keepers of wisdom: the academic philosophers.
 
Arguably the most popular vehicle of philosophy today is The Stone,” a series of columns on philosophical themes published on the website of the New York Times. These columns routinely receive hundreds of comments. No one has contributed more pieces to “The Stone” than Gary Gutting, who holds an endowed chair of philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. What Philosophy Can Do is a collection of short essays that Gutting has culled and developed from his offerings in the New York Times. These cover a wide swath of topics, including God, free will, art, education, consciousness, happiness, and the limits of science. 
 
Philosophy is the love of, and search for, wisdom—as opposed to knowledge. One of the richest bits of wisdom served up in this perspicuous book appears in the first chapter: Gutting calls it the “principle of charity.” Learning how to talk with people with whom we vehemently disagree is becoming harder all the time, as social media builds and strengthens our ideological echo chambers. 
Gutting has some sagacious advice: we need to heed “the injunction to develop our arguments in light of the best version of our opponent’s position. Here ‘best’ means the most plausible or defensible—at a minimum, a version that doesn’t assume that our opponents are intellectually or morally bankrupt.”
 
Of course, giving your opponent her best argument requires the emotional capacity to tolerate kilowatts of what the psychologist Leon Festinger famously termed “cognitive dissonance.” Festinger contended that being compelled to entertain ideas that conflict with strongly held beliefs induces anxiety. The stronger the conviction, the more likely we are to reject out of hand any argument that might threaten it. Or, to put it another way, the stronger the belief, the harder it will be to practice Gutting’s important “principal of charity.”

Moving from the methodological to the substantive, there is currently a churning industry of psychological research on happiness. Gutting summarizes some of these studies and then raises an eyebrow: “Even if empirical investigation could uncover the full range of possible conceptions of happiness, there would still remain the question of which conception(s) we ought to try to achieve. Here we have a question of value rather than fact: what is good to aim for, regardless of what anyone does in fact aim for.” And that, Gutting reminds us, is a question for philosophy, not psychology...

Some of Gutting’s most impassioned reflections spiral around the problem of whether we can sink to our knees and pray with the blessing of reason. Nie-tzsche rang the death knell of God—or of faith in God—and while Nietzsche’s announcement may still seem premature in the United States, it is not hard to find a free pew at an Easter service in Copenhagen. Many cleave to the conviction that we should never adhere to a belief for which we have no reason. Gutting examines the arguments of the so-called New Atheists, a cadre of nonbelievers who insist there is no more reason to believe in Jesus than in St. Nick. The Kierkegaard who held that faith involved a collision with what we understand might have said that the New Atheists have a point. Gutting, in contrast, is relentless in his effort to reveal grounds for dismissing the dismissals of faith.

IN THE BOOK'S most challenging pages, the author defends a sophisticated version of the ancient argument that there cannot be an endless series of causes, that there must be something necessary at the foundation of this cosmos of contingency. Gutting’s conclusion: Deny God’s existence if you will, but don’t imagine that believers are devoid of respectable reasons!

In Plato’s time, the main strife was between mythos and logos, story and reason. On almost every other page, Gutting has philosophy either grappling or dancing with science.
Read more...   

Additional resources

What Philosophy Can Do 1st Edition
Amazon writes, "In What Philosophy Can Do, Gary Gutting takes a philosopher’s scalpel to modern life’s biggest questions and the most powerful forces in our society―politics, science, religion, education, and capitalism―to show how we can improve our discussions of contentious contemporary issues."
Gary Gutting
Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company; 1 edition (September 8, 2015), $27.95, 304 pp.

Source: Commonweal


If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my Email Updates!

0 comments: