Krysten Crawford, Freelance Writer & Editor notes, "A review of test scores from 10,000 school district finds that gender
gaps in math and English vary with community wealth and racial
diversity."
When Stanford Professor Sean Reardon and his research team set out to
take an unprecedented look at how elementary school girls and boys
compare in academic achievement, they expected to find similar
stereotype-driven patterns across all 10,000 U.S. school districts: boys
consistently outperforming girls in math and girls steadily surpassing
boys in reading and writing by a wide margin.
Instead, Reardon and his team of researchers at Stanford Graduate School
of Education discovered wide variations in how girls and boys in grades
three through eight perform from one district to the next. In some
cases, girls did better in both math and reading. In others, boys had
the advantage in math and almost matched girls on English-related
subjects.
The swings in math scores were especially striking. Looking closely,
the researchers uncovered a pattern: in affluent, highly-educated and
predominantly white districts, boys outperformed girls in math. In
poorer, more racially diverse districts, girls often outdid boys in
math.
In reading and writing, however, the researchers found no correlation
with local socioeconomic status or racial makeup. In almost every
public-school system, girls came out ahead in reading scores, though to
different degrees across communities.
The study, published online as a working paper, marks the first comprehensive analysis of gender achievement gaps at the district level.
“Our goal was to map the patterns of gender achievement gaps across
the entire country in order to develop a better sense of what kinds of
communities and school districts most commonly provide equal educational
opportunities for girls and boys,” says Reardon, the Professor of
Poverty and Inequality in Education. We hope this information will help
educators and policymakers eliminate educational gender disparities.”
Beyond stereotypes
The findings were drawn from the Stanford Education Data Archive
(SEDA), a massive online collection of roughly 300 million math and
reading test scores from every public school in the United States from
fall 2008 through spring 2015. Reardon, one of the creators of SEDA, has
previously found that school systems with large numbers of low-income
students have average academic performances significantly below the national average. He's also shown that poverty alone does not determine the quality of a school district...
The paper’s additional co-authors were: Demetra Kalogrides, a researcher
at CEPA; Rosalia Zarate, a GSE doctoral student; and Anne Podolsky, a
researcher and policy analyst with the Learning Policy Institute.
Read more...
Additional resources
Gender Achievement Gaps in U.S. School Districts
Source: Stanford University News